Checklist for methodological assessments
|
TITOLO |
|
|
Date of release and authorship |
|
| Topic of the guideline: | |
| Has this guideline been drawn up by a multidisciplinary panel? | The medical specialty of each single participant, when provided in the guideline, is listed, along with the number of participants for each specialty and the type of non-medical participants: users, economists, pharmacists, nurses, psychologists, etc. Therefore, readers can have an idea of the balance of the different points of view inside the work group in relation to the specific topic treated in the guideline. |
|
Grading system |
The grading scheme chosen by the work group to define the strength of recommendations and the levels of evidence supporting recommendations is described. |
|
Does a bibliography exist? (year of updating)
Are the methods for reviewing literature explicit? |
|
| Is there an economical analysis? |
|
|
Has the conflict of interests been declared? |
|
|
Has a review been planned? (date) |
|
|
Has an implementation strategy been described? |
|
| Are the monitoring and evaluation markers described? |
Specific markers used to assess the actual implementation of the guideline, both in terms of process and outcome markers, are reported. |
|
Full-text availability online |
|
|
Additional documents (patients' version, flow chart, pocket version, etc.) |
|
